Cimabue’s Maestà di Assisi

Cimabue, 1240-1302
Maestà di Assisi, 1285-1288, fresco, 320×340 cm, Basilica of San Francesco in Assisi, Italy – Photo Credit: Amalia Spiliakou, April 2025

When I visited the Lower Church of San Francesco in Assisi in April 2025, I was struck by the quiet majesty of Cimabue’s Maestà di Assisi. Tucked into the dimly lit transept, this fresco radiates a sense of reverence and timelessness that photographs simply can’t capture. Seeing the Virgin Mary enthroned with the Christ Child, surrounded by a chorus of angels, I was moved by how Cimabue bridged the distance between the divine and the human. Painted around 1285, this work marks a crucial shift from the rigid, symbolic forms of Byzantine tradition toward a more naturalistic and emotionally resonant style. The delicate modeling of faces, the subtle sense of depth, and the quiet dignity of the figures all hinted at the artistic revolution that would soon follow. In this post, I’ll reflect on how Cimabue’s Maestà not only embodies the spiritual vision of its time but also left a lasting impression on me as a viewer, and on the course of Western art.

Cimabue’s Maestà di Assisi is in the south transept of the Lower Church of the Basilica of San Francesco in Assisi, a site of profound spiritual and artistic significance. The Basilica, constructed in the 13th century to honor Saint Francis, consists of two levels: the soaring Gothic Upper Church and the more intimate, Romanesque Lower Church. Within this dim, contemplative space, the Maestà forms part of a rich fresco program that includes scenes from the lives of the Virgin and Saint Francis, as well as works by other major artists of the period, including Giotto, Pietro Cavallini, and Simone Martini. Together, these masterpieces transform the Lower Church into a visual pilgrimage through the early stages of Italian art, where Cimabue’s contributions mark a critical bridge between the Byzantine tradition and the emerging naturalism of the Renaissance.

Cimabue, ca. 1240-ca. 1302
The Madonna in Majesty,
1285-86, tempera on panel, 385 x 223 cm, Uffizi Gallery, Florence, Italy
Maestà di Assisi, 1285-1288, fresco, 320×340 cm, Basilica of San Francesco in Assisi, Italy – Photo Credit: Amalia Spiliakou, April 2025

Cimabue, born Cenni di Pepo around 1240 in Florence, is widely regarded as one of the pivotal figures in the evolution of Western art. He was trained in the Byzantine tradition, which dominated Italian painting in the 13th century with its stylized forms and gold backgrounds, but Cimabue began to break from these conventions in subtle yet significant ways. Active mainly in Florence and later in Assisi, he worked on both panel paintings and large-scale fresco cycles. His most famous surviving works include the Santa Trinita Maestà (Uffizi Gallery), the Crucifix at Santa Croce, and his contributions to the decoration of the Basilica of San Francesco in Assisi. Cimabue was also the teacher of Giotto, whose revolutionary approach to realism would carry forward and amplify the artistic shift that Cimabue had initiated. Although his style remained rooted in medieval spirituality, Cimabue laid the groundwork for the expressive potential and spatial complexity that would define early Renaissance art.

Cimabue’s work is characterized by a remarkable tension between Byzantine rigidity and the early stirrings of naturalism. In his Assisi frescoes, particularly the Maestà in the Lower Church, he introduces a greater sense of depth and volume through delicate shading and a more thoughtful use of space. The figures, while still hieratic and front-facing, possess a dignity and gravitas that suggest a growing concern with human presence and emotional resonance. The Maestà di Assisi exemplifies this transition: the Virgin sits enthroned in a symmetrical, richly colored composition that respects traditional iconography, but the softened contours of her face and the more varied, overlapping arrangement of the angels begin to imply a spatial realism that was new for its time. Cimabue’s aesthetic choices reflect both reverence for sacred themes and a quiet but revolutionary move toward a more lifelike visual language—one that would deeply influence the course of Italian art.

Cimabue, ca. 1240-ca. 1302
Maestà di Assisi,
1285-1288, fresco, 320×340 cm, Basilica of San Francesco in Assisi, Italy – Photo Credit: Amalia Spiliakou, April 2025

In Cimabue’s Maestà di Assisi, Saint Francis is represented standing to the right of the throne, distinguishable by his simple friar’s habit, bare feet, and the visible stigmata on his hands, feet, and chest—a gesture of his deep union with Christ’s suffering. According to tradition the image of the saint is based on eyewitness descriptions by those who knew him personally and is considered one of the earliest and most authentic portrayals of Francis. The fresco originally included other figures, possibly Saint Anthony of Padua, on the left side, but that section is now lost, suggesting that the original composition once conveyed a broader devotional context. The contrast between the elevated, richly dressed figures of the Virgin and Child and the humble, sober figure of Francis reinforces the spiritual ideals of Franciscan humility and poverty. The recent restoration, completed in early 2024, which removed centuries of overpainting and yellowed protective layers, has revived the sharpness of Francis’s face and refined features, attributes described in medieval sources, allowing viewers today to reconnect more directly with Cimabue’s original vision and the powerful symbolism of the Poverello himself.

For a Student Activity titled Compare and Contrast Activity: Cimabue’s Two Maestà, please… Check HERE!

Bibliography: https://www.lavoce.it/assisi-presentato-il-restauro-che-svela-il-vero-volto-di-san-francesco/?utm_source=chatgpt.com and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cimabue?utm_source=chatgpt.com and https://www.assisinews.it/speciali/svelata-la-maesta-di-assisi-restituita-allaffresco-la-vera-materia-del-cimabue-foto/?utm_source=chatgpt.com and https://www.lanazione.it/cosa-fare/il-capolavoro-di-cimabue-gloria-alla-maesta-di-assisi-sublime-luce-al-restauro-8aaee18e?utm_source=chatgpt.com

The Elderly Couple from Voltera

Etruscan Urn of an Elderly Couple, 1st century BC, Terracotta, Museo Etrusco Guarnacci, Volterra, Italy – Photo Credit: Amalia Spiliakou, April 2025

Among the most evocative remnants of Etruscan funerary culture are the terracotta urns that once housed the ashes of the deceased, vessels not only of the body but of memory and identity. Urns featuring reclining couples engaged in a perpetual banquet scene offer a powerful glimpse into Etruscan beliefs about death and the afterlife. These intimate portrayals, often found in burial contexts, reflect a society that viewed death not as an end but as a continuation of life’s pleasures and social bonds. The Elderly Couple from Volterra, a remarkable terracotta lid housed in the Voltera Museo Etrusco Guarnacci, stands as a moving example of this tradition. Depicting a serene, aging pair side by side in eternal repose, the work speaks volumes about affection, legacy, and the Etruscan celebration of human connection beyond the grave.

I visited the Museo Etrusco Guarnacci in April 2025, drawn by its reputation as one of the oldest public museums in Europe, and I was not disappointed. The museum holds a quiet, contemplative atmosphere that feels perfectly suited to its long history and the ancient civilization it celebrates. Housed in the elegant Palazzo Desideri-Tangassi since 1877, the museum is the result of the extraordinary efforts of Mario Guarnacci, an 18th-century Volterran abbot and historian whose passion for antiquity helped preserve the city’s rich Etruscan heritage. Guarnacci’s vision was unusually forward-thinking: he not only amassed a remarkable collection but donated it to the public, ensuring that Volterra’s archaeological treasures remained in local hands and accessible to future generations.

Walking through the galleries, I was struck by the contrast between the museum’s two “souls.” Some rooms retain their 19th-century atmosphere, where rows of urns and shelves of artifacts sit densely arranged according to material or motif, reflecting a historical approach to display. Other sections have been redesigned to offer a modern, more interpretive experience, with carefully selected pieces presented along a chronological path that brings the Etruscan story into clearer focus. The upper floor, dedicated to Hellenistic Volterra, captures the artistic and cultural vitality of the city just before its integration into the Roman world, while the ground floor offers an elegant introduction to its earlier phases, from Villanovan to Classical.

What makes the Museo Guarnacci so special is how naturally it fits within the fabric of Volterra itself. This is a city where history isn’t hidden behind glass, it’s embedded in its walls, streets, and rhythm of life. The museum doesn’t just preserve Etruscan culture, it reinforces the living dialogue between past and present that defines Volterra’s character. Its locally sourced collection, displayed in a building that reflects layers of the city’s own evolution, makes the museum feel less like a separate institution and more like a thoughtful extension of the city’s identity. Visiting it was not just an exploration of ancient artifacts, but of the cultural values that continue to shape Volterra today.

The lid of the so-called Urn of the Elderly Spouses, now one of the most iconic pieces in the Museo Etrusco Guarnacci in Volterra, offers a rare and moving glimpse into Etruscan funerary art. Discovered in 1743 in a chamber tomb at the Ulimeto necropolis, the 41 cm in height terracotta piece, depicts an elderly married couple reclining together on a banquet couch, a klinai, a motif deeply rooted in Etruscan traditions of commemorating the dead as participants in eternal feasting. Intriguingly, both hollow figures feature large openings at the top of their heads, possibly designed for the insertion of ashes, raising the possibility that this piece served not merely as a lid but as the urn itself. The male figure rests in a semi-recumbent pose, while the woman, unusually, lies prone and raises her face toward him, her missing forearm suggesting she may once have been shown in a tender, caressing gesture. Both are dressed in tunics and cloaks, with the woman’s garment sleeveless, and the sculptor emphasized signs of age, wrinkles, sagging cheeks, thinning hair, imbuing the scene with poignant realism. Likely commissioned in the 1st century BC, the work draws on older iconography to evoke dignity, memory, and shared legacy.

Etruscan Urn of an Elderly Couple, 1st century BC, Terracotta, Museo Etrusco Guarnacci, Volterra, Italy – Photo Credit: Amalia Spiliakou, April 2025

Aesthetically, the urn stands apart for its expressive force and quiet originality. Unlike the more standardized examples of Etruscan cinerary sculpture, this piece refuses idealization in favor of a strikingly human portrayal of aging bodies and enduring companionship. The deeply etched facial features, furrowed brows, veined hands, softened flesh, reflect not only technical skill but also a sensitive awareness of the passage of time. Yet, scholars suggest that despite this vivid realism, the work was not intended as a literal portrait of a known Volterran couple. Instead, it follows a stylistic convention of the period: a generalized “type” marked by apparent naturalism, crafted to evoke emotional resonance rather than exact likeness. The result is a powerful blend of personal and symbolic, an image of love, memory, and the continuity of human bonds beyond death. Set within the museum’s broader collection, the Urn of the Elderly Spouses captures the spirit of Etruscan funerary belief while offering a universal meditation on age, intimacy, and the desire to be remembered together.

For a Student Activity, inspired by the Voltera Urn, please… Check HERE!

Bibliography: https://volterratur.it/en/poi/guarnacci-etruscan-museum/ and https://www.facebook.com/groups/archeologyandcivilizations/posts/9143041642455945/

Bust of a Lady

Bust of a Lady, circa 410 AD, from an Asia Minor workshop, possibly in
Aphrodisias, circa 410, white Phrygian (Dokimion) Marble, Height: 56 cm, Archaeological Museum of Chania, Greece

In the Archaeological Museum of Chania on the island of Crete, the Bust of a Lady offers a rare window into the shifting artistic and cultural values of the Late Roman and Early Christian period through the medium of female portraiture. During this era, women’s portraits began to diverge from classical Roman realism and overt displays of status, embracing a more stylized, introspective aesthetic aligned with emerging Christian ideals. Features such as large, contemplative eyes and serene expressions came to symbolize inner virtue and spiritual depth. While hairstyles and clothing still hinted at social rank, they also reflected increasing modesty, mirroring broader societal transformations.

This particular bust depicts a woman of aristocratic beauty in the prime of her life, aged approximately 25 to 30. She is shown frontally, with her neck gently turned to the right, lending the portrait a poised and lifelike presence. Her oval face is framed by a tall forehead, almond-shaped eyes once inlaid with rose-colored glass, small full lips, and a strong chin—features that convey both grace and inner fortitude. A decorative band of twenty-two stylized curls runs across her forehead and temples, while four braids crown her head, testifying to her refined appearance.

She is draped in a heavy himation falling in deep, classical folds over a lighter chiton, a detail that evokes the sculptural traditions of earlier periods and enhances the portrait’s intellectual elegance. Although her left shoulder is only partially modeled, the form suggests the bust was designed for a niche setting, likely within a private villa, where such an omission would remain unseen. The combination of fine craftsmanship, classical references, and material opulence speaks to both her high status and the enduring artistry of late Roman Crete.

Although initially dated between the 2nd and 4th centuries, recent scholarship proposes a more precise date in the early 5th century, during the reign of Theodosios II (c. 410 AD). This dating is based on strong stylistic parallels with imperial portraits of Valentinian II and Theodosios II, and the bust is thought to have originated in an Asia Minor workshop, likely Aphrodisias. If correct, this attribution provides rare evidence of continued cultural and artistic exchange between Crete and Constantinople following the catastrophic earthquake of 365 AD.

This striking portrait, crafted from fine-grained marble was unearthed in 1982 in Nea Chora, a neighborhood of modern Chania that once formed the western sector of ancient Kydonia. Found in unstratified fill, it lacks a secure archaeological context. Nonetheless, the area was continuously inhabited from the Roman to early Byzantine periods, and the sculpture’s discovery in a historically wealthy district known for luxurious homes supports the notion that it belonged to an elite and culturally vibrant community.

While Crete is most famously celebrated for its Bronze Age Minoan civilization, the island also enjoyed a remarkable cultural resurgence under Roman rule, a period that produced refined works of art like the Bust of a Lady in the Archaeological Museum of Chania. In a region often viewed through the lens of its ancient past, the portrait from Kydonia invites us to appreciate the island’s lesser-known legacy: a vibrant late antique society that continued to engage with the broader currents of imperial art, identity, and belief.

For a Student Activity inspired by the Bust of a Lady in the Archaeological Museum of Chania, please… Check HERE!

Bibliography: Heaven & Earth, Edited by Anastasia Drandaki, Demetra Papanikola-Bakirtzi, Anastasia Tourta, Exhibition Catalogue, Athens 2013 https://www.academia.edu/3655015/Heaven_and_Earth_Art_of_Byzantium_from_Greek_Collections_edited_by_Anastasia_Drandaki_Demetra_Papanikola_Bakirtzi_and_Anastasia_Tourta_Exh_cat_Athens_2013_238_9_275 Pages: 56-57 and https://amch.gr/collection/eikonistiki-protomi-astis-l-3176/

Triumph of Neptune and the Four Seasons

Triumph of Neptune and the Four Seasons, from La Chebba, Tunisia, late 2nd century AD,  Mosaic, Bardo National Museum, Tunis, Tunisia https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Neptune_Roman_mosaic_Bardo_Museum_Tunis.jpg

I remember standing before the Triumph of Neptune and the Four Seasons mosaic at the Bardo Museum, in Tunisia, sunlight filtering through the high windows as if to echo the brilliance of the scene before me. Neptune, regal and commanding, surged forward in his chariot drawn by sea creatures, while the Four Seasons circled him in a dance of eternal return, each one marked by fruits, flowers, or flowing cloaks. It was as if time itself had been trapped in tesserae, inviting me to reflect on nature’s rhythms and the grandeur of ancient imagination. Today, on the first day of Summer 2025, I’m drawn back to that moment, a reminder that every season begins with awe and the quiet power of renewal.

The Triumph of Neptune and the Four Seasons mosaic was unearthed in 1902 during archaeological excavations at a Roman seaside villa in La Chebba, a coastal town in northeastern Tunisia. The excavation, carried out by archaeologists D. Novak and A. Epinat, revealed a Roman villa comprising twelve rooms, most of which were paved with mosaics of notably good style. The principal room featured a grand composition: at the center, Neptune rides over the waves, attended by two companions, while the four corners are occupied by elegant personifications of the Four Seasons. Likely serving as an atrium or formal reception space, this square, columned room showcased the opulence and artistic refinement of Roman domestic life. Dating from the mid-2nd century AD, during the reign of Antoninus Pius, the mosaic reflects the cultural and aesthetic heights achieved in Roman Africa. After its discovery, it was transferred to the Bardo National Museum in Tunis, where it remains one of the most admired treasures of the collection.

The central medallion of the mosaic from La Chebba presents a commanding depiction of Neptune, the Roman god of the sea. He stands prominently in a quadriga—a four-horse chariot—drawn by hippocamps, mythical sea creatures that are part horse and part fish. Neptune is portrayed nearly nude, showcasing a muscular physique, and is adorned with a nimbus, symbolizing his divinity. In his hands, he holds a trident and a dolphin, traditional attributes associated with his dominion over the sea. The chariot is guided by a Triton and a Nereid, both depicted partially submerged, emphasizing the marine setting of the scene. This composition, as analyzed by Gifty Ako-Adounvo in her 1991 thesis, is unique in Roman mosaic art for combining Neptune with the Four Seasons, reflecting a sophisticated iconography that intertwines themes of nature’s cycles and divine authority.

In the Tunisian mosaic, the Four Seasons are strategically placed at the four corners of the square composition, creating a visual framework around the central circular medallion that features Neptune in his marine chariot. This architectural arrangement draws the viewer’s eye inward while symbolically enclosing Neptune’s dominion within the eternal cycle of time.

In the Triumph of Neptune and the Four Seasons mosaic from La Chebba, each Season is personified as a female figure and placed in one of the four corners of the square composition, surrounding the central medallion of Neptune. These figures are accompanied by specific animals that enrich the symbolic and seasonal imagery. Spring, adorned with floral motifs, wears a floral crown, evoking rebirth and the blossoming of nature. She is paired with a dog, possibly a greyhound, evoking themes of pastoral vitality and energy. Summer, holding sheaves of wheat, is flanked by a lion, representing the strength and intensity of the sun at its peak. Autumn, bearing grapes or a cornucopia, appears with a leopard, reinforcing the season’s association with Dionysian festivity and harvest. Winter, heavily cloaked and bearing pinecones or bare branches, is accompanied by a boar, an animal linked to the hunt and the harshness of the cold months.

Together, the figures of the Four Seasons not only anchor the composition visually but also embody a deeper message of natural rhythm and divine governance. Their accompanying animals, drawn from both myth and the natural world, intensify the seasonal symbolism while reflecting the broader North African mosaic tradition, which skillfully weaves cosmic order with scenes of rural life and agricultural labor.

For Student Activities inspired by the La Chebba mosaic, please… Check HERE!

Bibliography: American Journal of Archaeology, Jul. – Sep., 1903, Vol. 7, No. 3 (Jul. – Sep., 1903), pp. 357-404 Published by: Archaeological Institute of America, and https://honorthegodsblog.wordpress.com/2015/02/25/triumph-of-neptune-and-the-four-seasons-from-la/, and https://www.romeartlover.it/Bardo.html

Angelos Giallinas

Angelos Giallina, Greek Artist, 1857 – 1939
The Parthenon, Watercolour over Pencil, 273 by 455 mm, Private Collection
https://www.sothebys.com/en/buy/auction/2024/royal-noble/the-parthenon?locale=en

In his approach to the Parthenon, Angelos Giallinas (1857–1939), a prominent Greek watercolorist of the late 19th and early 20th centuries, not only portrayed the monument as an architectural subject but elevated it to a lyrical symbol of Greek heritage. His work, deeply connected to the theme of Light, Memory, and Reverence, reflects a profound sensitivity to the interplay between the ancient ruins and the surrounding natural environment. Born in Corfu, Giallinas studied at the local School of Fine Arts before continuing his education in Venice, Naples, and Rome. There, he absorbed the refined tonalities of the Italian landscape tradition, which he later fused with a uniquely Greek sensibility rooted in poetic realism and national pride.

Giallinas’s depictions of the Parthenon are marked by a restrained yet evocative use of watercolor. He did not aim for archaeological precision but instead emphasized the atmospheric qualities of the scene, the golden hues of Attic sunlight, the gradations of the Athenian sky, and the quiet dialogue between the ruins and the surrounding landscape. This impressionistic approach aligned with European aesthetic movements of his time while remaining deeply connected to the emotional resonance of place and memory in Greek culture.

Throughout his career, Giallinas gained significant recognition both at home and abroad. He held successful exhibitions across Europe, including in London, where his work attracted the attention of collectors and critics. In 1902, he was commissioned by the British royal family to create a series of Greek landscapes, further elevating his international profile. He played a pivotal role in legitimizing watercolor as a medium for serious artistic expression within Greek art, moving beyond its traditional role as a preparatory tool.

Technically, Giallinas mastered watercolor’s fluidity and transparency with exceptional subtlety. His brushwork was controlled yet expressive, employing translucent washes to create depth without sacrificing luminosity. He avoided harsh contrasts, favoring gradations of color that conveyed a meditative stillness. In his hands, watercolor became a means not just of depiction, but of evocation—his skies, seas, and stones imbued with feeling as much as form.

Crucially, Giallinas’s art reflects the broader cultural currents of post-independence Greece, where landscape painting became a vehicle for expressing national identity. His serene views of the Parthenon and other iconic sites participated in the 19th-century project of reconnecting modern Greece to its classical past. Yet his interpretation was not triumphant or didactic; instead, it was introspective and elegiac. By rendering these monuments with atmospheric sensitivity rather than monumental grandeur, Giallinas offered a vision of Greece that was rooted in continuity, memory, and quiet resilience—qualities that resonated deeply in a society still defining itself between antiquity and modernity.

When I look at Giallinas’s paintings of the Parthenon, I’m struck by their quiet power. There’s no theatrical drama, no exaggerated gesture—just a deep, contemplative calm. He treats the monument not as a tourist spectacle but as something intimate: a memory held in light and stone. The watercolor bleeds gently around the contours of the ruins, dissolving into the pale Athenian sky, as if he’s painting not only what he sees but what he feels. The Parthenon appears suspended in time, drifting between history and the present. Giallinas’s brush whispers rather than declares—and in that quietness, he captures something enduring, something essentially Greek.

For a Student Activity, inspired by Angelos Giallinas’s interpretation of the Parthenon, please… Check HERE!

You can view a former Teacher-Curator BLOG POST titled ‘Garden in Corfu by Angelos Giallinas’… https://www.teachercurator.com/art/garden-in-corfu-by-angelos-giallinas/?fbclid=IwY2xjawKIGElleHRuA2FlbQIxMABicmlkETF5ZWtES1JYMDBPQVY5c055AR7-a8br2Ukq3ahJuUCSU0eESsf5WwODDQtNdgSK0kYgNnSS856uiARVWSentw_aem_T8IM2xzIAGQQEC4qcWajdQ

Bibliography: https://corfuguidedtours.com/a-renowned-painters-historic-mansion/?utm_source=chatgpt.com and https://haaa.gr/news/en_30.php?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Statuette of Asklepios Enthroned

Statuette of Asklepios Enthroned, Athenian workshop, 150 – 200 AD, Marble, Height: 42.3 cm, Archaeological Museum of Ancient Corinth, Greece https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1019102956923674&id=100064719367083&set=a.462183875948921&locale=el_GR

…Asclepius, that gentle craftsman who drove pain from the limbs that he healed, that hero who cured all types of diseases… as Pindar writes in Pythian 3, was the ancient Greek god of medicine and healing, both revered and deified for his mastery over human suffering. This divine healer is brought vividly to life in the Statuette of Asklepios Enthroned, crafted in an Athenian workshop between 150–200 AD and now housed in the Archaeological Museum of Ancient Corinth. Carved from marble and standing 42.3 cm tall, the figure captures Asclepius in a moment of quiet authority, seated with the familiar serpent-entwined staff at his side—a timeless symbol of restoration and medical care. Though created centuries after the height of his cult, the statuette reflects the enduring presence of Asclepius in both public worship and private devotion, embodying the belief in divine healing that spanned from the classical world into the Roman era. https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0162%3Abook%3DP.%3Apoem%3D3

The Ancient Greek myths of Asclepius tell the story of a mortal born to the god Apollo and the human woman Coronis, who was raised and taught the healing arts by the wise centaur Chiron. Gifted beyond any healer before him, Asclepius became so skilled that he was said to cure incurable diseases and even bring the dead back to life. This miraculous power, however, drew the ire of Zeus, who feared that such abilities would upset the natural balance between life and death. In response, Zeus struck Asclepius down with a thunderbolt, ending his mortal life but paving the way for his deification. Worshipped across the Greek world, particularly in healing sanctuaries known as Asclepieia, Asclepius became a symbol of divine compassion and medical wisdom, bridging the realms of myth, religion, and early medical practice.

The healing sanctuaries of Asclepios become some of the most important religious and medical centers of the classical world. The most famous of these was at Epidaurus in the northeastern Peloponnese, a sprawling complex that included temples, dormitories for dream incubation, and even a theater. Other major centers of his cult were located on the island of Kos, where the physician Hippocrates is said to have trained, and at Pergamon in Asia Minor. In Athens, he was worshipped at the Asclepieion located at the foot of the Acropolis, near the Theater of Dionysus. These sanctuaries attracted the sick and afflicted from across the Greek world, who came seeking cures through ritual purification, offerings, and dreams in which Asclepius or his sacred serpent revealed treatments. His worship was not only a spiritual experience but also a foundational element in the evolution of ancient medicine.

Statuettes of deities from a late Roman house, Marble, Archaeological Museum of Ancient Corinth in Greece Photo: https://www.nga.gov/features/slideshows/from-the-ancient-to-the-byzantine-world.html#slide_2

The Statuette of Asklepios Enthroned, now housed in the Archaeological Museum of Ancient Corinth, was discovered during 1999 excavation period (by the American School of Classical Studies) of a domestic shrine within a luxurious Roman villa in the Panayia Field area of Corinth. The villa was destroyed by a violent earthquake in the late fourth century AD, preserving a collection of marble statuettes representing various deities, including Artemis, Dionysos, Herakles, Pan, Europa and Roma, alongside Asklepios (Sanders 1999, 441–444). These statuettes were part of a private cultic assemblage, suggesting ongoing pagan devotional practices within the home, even as Christianity was becoming dominant in the region. The presence of these figures in such an opulent residence reflects the persistence—albeit increasingly private—of traditional Greco-Roman religious customs among segments of the local elite during the final phases of pagan worship in Late Antique Corinth

Dated to 150–200 AD and discovered in Corinth, the Statuette presents a richly detailed image of the healing god seated in quiet authority. Asclepius is shown leaning slightly forward on a high-backed throne, his head turned gently to the right. He wears a plain round wreath atop his parted, curling hair, which falls to his shoulders, and his face is framed by a mustache and full, curly beard. Draped in a himation that cascades from his left shoulder in V-shaped folds with a zigzag border, the god’s right arm once rested over a large coiled snake, his sacred symbol, positioned along the right side of the throne. His network-style sandals, tied above the ankle, rest on a substantial footstool with squat animal feet and a central groove, while the throne itself is ornately carved with square-incised panels on the back, lyre-shaped legs, and projecting wings. A cushion beneath him adds to the sense of formality and comfort, enhancing the image of divine majesty.

Scholars suggest that this statuette may be a scaled marble reinterpretation of the famed chryselephantine cult statue of Asclepius by Thrasymedes of Paros, described by Pausanias in the temple at Epidaurus (2.27.2). Like the legendary cult image, the Corinthian figure holds a staff in his left arm and extends his right hand toward the coiled serpent, reflecting iconography seen on fourth-century BC Epidaurian coins. The white marble and traces of gilding on the Panagia statuette evoke the luxurious materials of ivory and gold used in the original, indicating it was likely crafted in homage to the Epidaurian prototype. This connection underscores the continuity of Asclepius’ cult and the enduring reverence for his divine healing power well into the Roman period.

For a Student Activity inspired by the Statuette of Asklepios Enthroned in Corinth, please… Check HERE!

Bibliography: chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.ascsa.edu.gr/uploads/media/hesperia/25068051.pdf  Pagan Statuettes in Late Antique Corinth, Sculptures from the Panayia Domus, HESPERIA 77 (2008), Pages 89-161

Byzantine Engagement Ring in the Stathatos Collection

Engagement Ring with a Greek Inscription, about 1175–1300 AD, Gold and enamel, Diameter: 2.1 x 2.3 cm, National Archaeological Museum, Athens, Greece
Image courtesy of the National Archaeological Museum, Athens
https://blogs.getty.edu/iris/put-a-ring-on-it/

In the shimmering glow of Byzantium’s golden age, love and faith were often sealed in objects of exquisite craftsmanship and deep symbolic meaning. Among these treasures, Byzantine Engagement Rings stand as powerful tokens of devotion, not only between husband and wife but also to God. One such remarkable example is the Byzantine Engagement Ring in the Stathatos Collection, adorned with intricate enamel decoration, reflecting the era’s profound intertwining of romance and spirituality. This ring, much like the art and culture of its time, serves as a testament to a society where marriage was both a sacred bond and a reflection of divine harmony. Let us explore the beauty, symbolism, and historical significance of this extraordinary artifact.

Ashley Hilton’s Getty IRIS blog post, “Put a Ring On It,” sparked my curiosity about the deep personal and historical narratives embedded in Byzantine jewelry, particularly the Byzantine gold ring of Goudeles from the Stathatos Collection. This ring, inscribed with a dedication to a lady named Maria, serves as a tangible testament to love, devotion, and identity in the Byzantine world. Hilton’s discussion of the ring inspired me to delve deeper into its historical and social context, as well as the role of the Goudeles family in Byzantine society.

So, let’s explore the ‘who’, ‘how’ and ‘what’ of this amazing Byzantine Engagement Ring by posing some questions!

Who was Goudeles and who was Maria, and what do we know about their identity or social status in Byzantine society? The name “Goudeles” is associated with a prominent Byzantine family active from the 11th to the 15th centuries. Members of this family held various significant positions within the Byzantine Empire. The gold engagement ring from the Stathatos Collection bears an inscription (on bezel): MNHCTΡΟΝ |ΔΙΔΟΜΗΓΟΥ | ΔΕΛΗC M | AΡHA (I, Goudeles, give this engagement ring to Maria). While the exact identity of Goudeles and Maria remains uncertain, the ring’s craftsmanship and materials suggest that both the bride and the groom lived during the late 12th early 13th centuries, and belonged to wealthy and possibly influential families. ​For the groom, given the family’s historical prominence, it’s plausible that the Goudeles who commissioned this ring was a member of this distinguished lineage, reflecting the family’s sustained status within Byzantine society.

What was the historical significance of the Goudeles family in the Byzantine Empire? The Goudeles family was a prominent Byzantine lineage, contributing significantly to both the military and administrative sectors of the empire over several centuries. The earliest known reference to the family appears on a 10th-century lead seal, which mentions a member of the Goudeles family who held the titles of imperial protospatharios and strategos, signifying his high-ranking military status. However, the exact details of his service and the specific region he governed remain uncertain.

During the Komnenian period, one of the most notable figures was Basil Tzykandeles Goudeles, who married Eudokia Angelina, the daughter of Theodora Komnene and Constantine Angelos. This alliance linked the Goudeles family to the ruling Komnenian and Angelos dynasties, which produced emperors such as Isaac II Angelos and Alexios III Angelos.

In the late 14th and early 15th centuries, the Goudeles family strengthened its ties with the Palaiologan Dynasty through marriage. Among its distinguished members were Georgios Goudelis and Nicholas Goudelis. Georgios, in his testament, referred to himself as Ego Georgius Gudeles, servus prepotentis et sancti imperatoris et regis nostri (“I, George Gudeles, servant of our powerful and holy emperor and king”), reflecting his position within the Byzantine aristocracy. He served as mesazon (a chief ministerial role) under Emperors John V Palaiologos and Manuel II Palaiologos, assisting in governance and administration. Nicholas Goudeles, a diplomat in imperial service, was at one point considered for a high advisory position. During the final siege of Constantinople in 1453, he was among the defenders of the city’s Land Walls, and his fate after the city’s fall remains unknown. After the fall of Constantinople, members of the Goudeles family migrated to Italy, where they remained active in international commerce, particularly through cooperation with the maritime republic of Genoa.

Overall, the Goudeles family played a crucial role in Byzantine history, with members serving in high military, diplomatic, and administrative capacities. Their strategic alliances with ruling dynasties and their contributions to the empire’s governance reflect their lasting historical significance.

How does the design, decoration, and inscription of the Goudeles Engagement Ring in the Stathatos Collection showcase Byzantine artistry and symbolism? The Goudeles engagement ring in the Stathatos Collection is a fine example of inscribed Byzantine engagement jewelry, reflecting both artistic craftsmanship and social status. The ring’s band gradually widens to form an almost circular bezel. It is flat on the interior and slightly convex on the exterior, featuring an elaborate stylized vegetal decoration with intersecting blue spirals and green, red, and white flowers on its sides. The bezel is flat and contains a four-line inscription in blue enamel, framed within a green border. The intricate detailing, the use of precious materials, and the weight of the ring indicate that it likely belonged to a wealthy individual.

In Byzantine tradition, engagement rings (annuli pronubi), like wedding rings, were worn on the fourth digit (ring finger) of the left hand, as it was believed to have a direct connection to the heart, symbolizing eternal love and commitment. This ring exemplifies the fusion of Byzantine artistry, social hierarchy, and symbolic marital customs.

For a Student Activity, please… Check HERE!

Bibliography: https://blogs.getty.edu/iris/put-a-ring-on-it/ and https://www.doaks.org/resources/seals/byzantine-seals/BZS.1958.106.3763 and ΣΟΛΩΜΟΥ Σ. (2019). Η συμβολή της μελέτης των διαθηκών της παλαιολόγειας περιόδου στην έρευνα των κοσμικών αξιωμάτων και τιμητικών τίτλων. Byzantina Symmeikta, 29, 25–72. https://doi.org/10.12681/byzsym.15563 and https://www.academia.edu/31240474/Heaven_and_Earth_Art_of_Byzantium_from_Greek_Collections_exh_cat_National_Gallery_of_Art_Washington_DC_J_P_Getty_Museum_the_Art_Institute_of_Chicago_Athens_2013_Edited_by_A_Drandaki_A_Tourta_and_D_Papanikola_Bakirtzi

The Medici in Faenza

Majolica Plate decorated with the coat of arms of the Medici of Florence, 16th century (1525 – 1530), Diameter: 12.3 cm, International Museum of Ceramics in Faenza, Italy – Photo Credit: Amalia Spiliakou, April 2025

Visiting the International Museum of Ceramics in Faenza was an unforgettable experience, an inspiring journey through centuries of ceramic artistry. As someone with a deep appreciation for both history and design, I was truly impressed by the museum’s extraordinary collection, which showcases the global and cultural significance of ceramics in such a thoughtfully curated way. Among the many treasures, one piece that especially captivated me was a modest yet elegant Majolica plate from the 16th century, skillfully adorned with the coat of arms of the Medici of Florence. Despite its small size, just 12.3 cm in diameter, its refined craftsmanship and understated beauty spoke volumes. It offered a glimpse into The Medici in Faenza, a subtle yet powerful reminder of how far their influence reached, and how even the simplest objects can carry the weight of history with quiet grace. https://www.micfaenza.org/en/

Let’s explore the ‘how’, ‘’, ‘why’, and ‘what’ of the amazing ‘Majolica Plate decorated with the coat of arms of the Medici of Florence’ in theInternational Museum of Ceramics in Faenzaby posing some questions!

What is Majolica, and why was it significant in Renaissance Italy? A Majolica plate is a type of tin-glazed earthenware that became highly popular in Renaissance Italy for its vibrant colors and intricate designs. Made from clay and coated with a white tin glaze, the surface served as a canvas for hand-painted decoration using metallic oxide pigments, which became brilliantly glossy after firing. These plates often featured historical, mythological, or heraldic imagery—like the Medici coat of arms—and were prized for both their beauty and craftsmanship. More than just functional objects, Majolica plates were symbols of wealth, status, and artistic refinement, reflecting the cultural and political identity of their time.

What is the origin of the term “Majolica,” and how has its meaning and use evolved over time? The term “Majolica” originates from the Spanish island of Mallorca (Majorca), which was a key trading hub for ceramics between the Islamic world and Italy during the Middle Ages. Italian potters believed that the brightly colored, tin-glazed pottery imported through Mallorca came from there, and the name “Maiolica” (the Italian form) became associated with this style of earthenware. Initially, it referred specifically to the luxurious, vividly painted ceramics produced in Renaissance Italy, especially in centers like Faenza, Deruta, and Urbino. Over time, particularly in the 19th century, the term “Majolica” began to be used more broadly—and sometimes confusingly—to describe other types of colorful ceramics, including English Victorian ware with entirely different techniques. Despite this evolution, in its original sense, Majolica remains a celebrated hallmark of Italian Renaissance artistry and innovation in ceramics.

What role did the city of Faenza play in the development and prominence of Majolica earthenware? Faenza played a central role in the development and prominence of Majolica earthenware during the Renaissance, becoming one of the most important ceramic production centers in Italy. The city’s artisans were renowned for their technical skill and artistic innovation, helping to refine the tin-glazing technique that gave Majolica its brilliant, glossy surface. Faenza’s strategic location along trade routes and its strong guild traditions fostered an environment where ceramic craftsmanship could flourish. So influential was its production that the French term for fine tin-glazed pottery—faïence—derives from the name of the city. Faenza’s legacy in ceramics continues today, celebrated through institutions like the International Museum of Ceramics, which honors its rich contribution to the art form.

Why is the International Museum of Ceramics in Faenza considered an important institution in the world of ceramic art and history? The International Museum of Ceramics in Faenza is considered one of the most important institutions in the world of ceramic art and history due to its vast and diverse collection, its historical significance, and its role in preserving and promoting ceramic heritage. Founded in 1908, the museum houses work from ancient civilizations to contemporary ceramic art, representing cultures from across the globe. It is especially renowned for its comprehensive display of Italian Majolica, with masterpieces from key production centers like Faenza, Deruta, and Urbino. The museum also serves as a vital center for research, education, and innovation in ceramics, hosting exhibitions, workshops, and scholarly initiatives. Its presence in Faenza—a city with centuries-old ceramic traditions—further cements its role as a guardian of both local craftsmanship and international ceramic excellence.

How would you describe the ‘Majolica Plate decorated with the coat of arms of the Medici of Florence,’ in the International Museum of Ceramics in Faenza, Italy? When I visited the International Museum of Ceramics in Faenza on the 1st of April 2025, one piece that left a lasting impression on me was the Majolica Plate decorated with the coat of arms of the Medici of Florence. Though modest in size—just 12.3 cm in diameter—it stood out as a refined and powerful example of Renaissance ceramic artistry. Created between 1525 and 1530, the plate features the iconic Medici heraldry, beautifully rendered in vibrant tin-glaze colors that still hold their brilliance centuries later. What struck me most was the balance between its elegant simplicity and the rich symbolism it carried. The clean lines and careful proportions reflect the technical mastery of the Renaissance ceramic tradition, while the Medici emblem speaks volumes about the political and cultural reach of this powerful Florentine family. Standing before it, I felt a quiet awe—this small object encapsulated so much history, beauty, and meaning in such a graceful form.

For a Student Activity, please… Check HERE!

Bibliography: https://www.metmuseum.org/met-publications/maiolica-italian-renaissance-ceramics-in-the-metropolitan-museum-of-art

Gian Lorenzo Bernini’s bust of Duke Francesco I d’Este

Gian Lorenzo Bernini, 1598-1680
Bust of Francesco I d’Este, 1650–1652, Marble, 98 x 106 x 50 cm, Galleria Estense, Modena, Italy – Photo Credit: Amalia Spiliakou April 2025

Upon entering the Galleria Estense in Modena, visitors are greeted by a masterpiece of Baroque sculpture that sets an immediate tone of grandeur and theatricality, Gian Lorenzo Bernini’s bust of Duke Francesco I d’Este. Commissioned in the 1650s, this dazzling marble portrait is more than a likeness; it is a triumph of artistic bravura that captures the duke in a moment of almost divine command, his chest proudly thrust forward, his locks swirling with motion, and his gaze lofty and enigmatic. Bernini’s extraordinary ability to fuse idealization with vitality makes the bust an unforgettable encounter at the heart of the gallery’s collection. Decades later and miles away, the bust’s spirit found a new interpretation through the brush of Giovanni Boldini. His painting Bust of Francesco I d’Este after Gian Lorenzo Bernini, now in the National Gallery of Art in Washington, D.C., revives the sculpture’s theatrical essence in painterly form—transforming cool marble into a vibrant, expressive study of light and form. Boldini, known for his flair and fluid technique, pays homage not only to Bernini’s virtuosity but also to the enduring legacy of Baroque splendor.

​In August 1650, Duke Francesco I d’Este of Modena commissioned Gian Lorenzo Bernini to sculpt his portrait in marble. Initially, Bernini was reluctant to undertake the project without meeting the Duke in person, considering it an “almost impossible” task. However, with the persistent intercession of Cardinal Rinaldo d’Este, the Duke’s brother, Bernini agreed, provided he received multiple portraits of the Duke and precise measurements of his height and shoulder width. Consequently, two profile portraits by Justus Sustermans were sent to Rome, while a frontal portrait by Jean Boulanger did not arrive in time. Bernini began sculpting in August 1651 and completed the bust by September. The sculpture arrived in Modena in November, and upon unveiling, the Duke was so impressed that he paid Bernini 3,000 scudi—the same amount Pope Innocent X had paid for the Fountain of the Four Rivers in Rome. This generous payment not only reflected the Duke’s satisfaction but also underscored his ambition to elevate the cultural stature of the Este court through patronage of renowned artists.

Gian Lorenzo Bernini, 1598-1680
Bust of Francesco I d’Este, 1650–1652, Marble, 98 x 106 x 50 cm, Galleria Estense, Modena, Italy https://ducatoestense.com/en/beni-storici-artistici/bust-of-duke-francesco-i-deste/

Bernini’s bust portrait of Francesco I d’Este stands as a quintessential example of Baroque art, embodying the movement’s defining traits of dynamism, theatricality, and grandeur. Far from being a static likeness, the sculpture radiates energy and authority: the Duke’s chest swells with pride, his elaborate curls cascade in dramatic motion, and his expression conveys both noble detachment and inner vitality. Bernini masterfully transforms marble into a living presence, infusing the work with psychological depth and an almost divine aura. This portrait doesn’t merely represent Francesco—it exalts him, turning the Duke into a timeless symbol of princely power and ambition. In doing so, Bernini demonstrates how sculpture in the Baroque era was not just about capturing appearances, but about commanding emotion and crafting an idealized image of rulership through the language of art.

Gian Lorenzo Bernini, 1598-1680
Bust of Francesco I d’Este, 1650–1652, Marble, 98 x 106 x 50 cm, Galleria Estense, Modena, Italy – Photo Credit: Amalia Spiliakou April 2025
Giovanni Boldini, 1842-1931
Bust of Francesco I d’Este after Gian Lorenzo Bernini, c. 1890/1900, brown and blue washes on ivory wove paper, 45.5 x 30.4 cm, National Gallery of Art, Washington DC, USA https://www.nga.gov/press/acquisitions/2022/boldini.html

In the late 19th century, Giovanni Boldini, celebrated for his dynamic and elegant portraits, created a wash drawing titled Bust of Francesco I d’Este, inspired by Gian Lorenzo Bernini’s renowned marble sculpture. Executed around 1890–1900, during Boldini’s flourishing career in Paris, the drawing captures the essence of Bernini’s Baroque masterpiece through expressive brown and blue washes on ivory wove paper. Boldini’s rendition emphasizes the dramatic curls and vigorous movement of the original bust, portraying the head in full profile while simplifying certain elements, such as omitting the lace collar and armor. This approach highlights Boldini’s theatrical style and his ability to convey vitality and motion, aligning with the gestural tendencies of contemporaries like John Singer Sargent. The drawing not only pays homage to Bernini’s work but also reflects Boldini’s exploration of abstract form, bridging 19th-century impressionism and the gestural styles that would influence 20th-century modernism. Acquired by the National Gallery of Art in 2021, this piece enriches the museum’s collection, illustrating the enduring impact of Baroque artistry on later generations

For art lovers, the Galleria Estense in Modena offers more than a collection, it offers a journey into the heart of artistic brilliance, where Bernini’s bust of Francesco I d’Este greets visitors with imperial flair and sculptural poetry. Its enduring legacy, later reimagined through the fluid hand of Giovanni Boldini, reminds us that true masterpieces do not merely survive the passage of time—they continue to speak, to inspire, and to live on in new and unexpected forms.

For a Student Activity on Gian Lorenzo Bernini’s Bust of Francesco I d’Este, and Giovanni Boldini painting of Francesco’s Bust, please… Check HERE!

Bibliography: https://ducatoestense.com/en/beni-storici-artistici/bust-of-duke-francesco-i-deste/ and https://www.nga.gov/press/acquisitions/2022/boldini.html

Mithraic Aion and Orphic Phanes

Syncretistic deity Aion-Phanes, second quarter of 2nd century AD, Marble, 71×48,5 cm, Galleria Estense, Modena, Italy – Photo Credit: Amalia Spiliakou, April 2025

In the richly symbolic world of late antiquity, the Roman relief sculpture housed in the Galleria Estense in Modena, Italy, offers a captivating glimpse into the syncretic religious landscape of the 2nd century AD. This intricate relief brings together two enigmatic deities—Mithraic Aion and Orphic Phanes—whose fusion reflects a profound cosmological vision. Aion, central to Mithraic mystery cults, embodies boundless time and eternity, often depicted encircled by the zodiac, signifying the cyclical nature of existence. Phanes, a radiant, primordial god of light and creation in Orphic tradition, emerges from the cosmic egg, symbolizing the birth of order from chaos. The pairing of these figures on a single relief not only highlights the cross-pollination of Eastern and Hellenic religious ideas within the Roman Empire but also reveals a deep fascination with the mysteries of time, origin, and divine illumination.

Let’s explore the ‘what’, and the ‘how’ of this amazing Roman relief sculpture by posing some questions!

What does the figure of Aion represent in the context of Mithraic iconography, and how does his symbolism reflect the cosmological themes of Mithraism? Aion, in the context of Mithraism, is a mysterious and symbolic deity associated with eternal, cyclical time and the cosmos. While not a central figure in the Mithraic mysteries, he appears in some Mithraic iconography, most notably as a lion-headed figure entwined by a serpent, often standing on a globe and surrounded by zodiac symbols. This image represents cosmic time, the eternal cycle of the heavens, and possibly the control of celestial forces. Though not named explicitly in surviving texts, this figure is often identified as Aion, drawing parallels with the Greek personification of time, the Persian god Zurvan, and even with Gnostic aeons. Aion’s presence in Mithraism underscores the religion’s deep cosmological and esoteric focus, blending influences from Greco-Roman, Persian, and later philosophical traditions into a symbolic representation of the eternal and mysterious forces that govern the universe.

Syncretistic deity Aion-Phanes, second quarter of 2nd century AD, Marble, 71×48,5 cm, Galleria Estense, Modena, Italy – Photo Credit: Amalia Spiliakou, April 2025

What does the figure of Phanes represent in the context of Orphic iconography, and how does his symbolism reflect the cosmological themes of Orphism? In the context of Orphic iconography, Phanes represents the primordial god of creation, light, and life, embodying the emergence of the cosmos from a state of chaos. He is often depicted as a radiant, androgynous figure, sometimes with wings, surrounded by zodiac symbols, and entwined by a serpent, much like the later images of Aion. In Orphic cosmology, Phanes is the first-born deity who emerges from the cosmic egg, breaking it open to release the ordered universe. He is the source of all gods and beings, radiating divine intelligence and life into the cosmos. His symbolism reflects key Orphic themes such as rebirth, cosmic order, and divine light, and his role as a creator positions him at the center of a spiritual narrative in which the soul seeks to return to its divine origin. Phanes illustrates the Orphic belief in a hidden, mystical structure underlying the universe, one governed by divine reason and illuminated by sacred knowledge.

Syncretistic deity Aion-Phanes, second quarter of 2nd century AD, Marble, 71×48,5 cm, Galleria Estense, Modena, Italy – Photo Credit: Amalia Spiliakou, April 2025
Syncretistic deity Aion-Phanes, second quarter of 2nd century AD, Marble, 71×48,5 cm, Galleria Estense, Modena, Italy https://gallerie-estensi.beniculturali.it/blog/il-rilievo-marmoreo-con-il-dio-aion-phanes/

How does the Modena relief of Aion/Phanes visually represent the cosmological and theological concepts of time, creation, and divine order in Roman mystery religions? The Roman relief sculpture from the second quarter of the second century AD, housed in the Galleria Estense in Modena, presents a richly symbolic and cosmologically charged depiction of a deity identified with Aion, Phanes, Chronos, or Eros—various names for a single primordial figure associated with cosmic time, creation, and divine light. At the center stands a radiant, naked youth whose powerful presence merges multiple divine attributes. He holds a thunderbolt in his right hand and a long staff in his left, suggesting authority over both cosmic order and divine revelation. His hoof-shaped feet rest on an upturned cone, half of a cosmic egg, from which flames burst—symbolizing the act of creation. A matching, flame-emitting cone rises above his five-rayed, curly-haired head, reinforcing the theme of birth from chaos. Encircling his body in four spirals is a serpent, its head emerging above the flames—an ancient symbol of eternity, rebirth, and cosmic continuity. The figure’s wings, lion’s head chest mask, and emerging animal heads (a ram and a buck) further emphasize his fusion of natural, divine, and astrological forces. The crescent moon behind his shoulders adds a lunar dimension, balancing the solar imagery of fire and rays.

Syncretistic deity Aion-Phanes, second quarter of 2nd century AD, Marble, 71×48,5 cm, Galleria Estense, Modena, Italy – Photo Credit: Amalia Spiliakou, April 2025

This figure is enclosed within an elliptical zodiacal band, divided into twelve sections, each containing a zodiac sign, beginning with Aries above the deity’s head and continuing counterclockwise through the signs to Pisces. Each sign is carefully personified—for instance, Gemini are shown embracing, with one playing a lyre, while Aquarius is represented as a naked youth pouring water from an amphora. The full zodiac, surrounding the god, positions him at the center of cosmic time and astral influence, underscoring his identity as a divine force who governs the heavens and the passage of time. In each corner of the relief, the four winds are personified—Zephyrus, Notus, Boreas, and Eurus—contributing to the all-encompassing cosmological vision. An inscription dedicates the sculpture to Felix and Euphrosyne, though her name was later partially erased, likely due to the Mithraic ban on female initiates. This relief encapsulates the esoteric worldview of late Roman religious thought, where divine creation, astrological order, and mystery cult symbolism intertwine in a single, intricate visual theology.

From fire and serpent, time itself takes form—Aion-Phanes rises, eternal guardian of the stars and the spark of creation.

For Student Activities inspired by the amazing Roman relief sculpture of Aion-Phanes in Galleria Estense in Modena, please… Check HERE!

Bibliography: Aion by Doro Levi, Hesperia: The Journal of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens, Vol. 13, No. 4 (Oct. – Dec., 1944), pp. 269-314 (46 pages) https://www.jstor.org/stable/146699?read-now=1&seq=42#page_scan_tab_contents and https://gallerie-estensi.beniculturali.it/en/collections/works-of-art/#/dettaglio/821254_Aion/Phanes%20all’interno%20dello%20zodiaco and https://www.tertullian.org/rpearse/mithras/display.php?page=cimrm695