Cimabue’s Maestà di Assisi

Cimabue, 1240-1302
Maestà di Assisi, 1285-1288, fresco, 320×340 cm, Basilica of San Francesco in Assisi, Italy – Photo Credit: Amalia Spiliakou, April 2025

When I visited the Lower Church of San Francesco in Assisi in April 2025, I was struck by the quiet majesty of Cimabue’s Maestà di Assisi. Tucked into the dimly lit transept, this fresco radiates a sense of reverence and timelessness that photographs simply can’t capture. Seeing the Virgin Mary enthroned with the Christ Child, surrounded by a chorus of angels, I was moved by how Cimabue bridged the distance between the divine and the human. Painted around 1285, this work marks a crucial shift from the rigid, symbolic forms of Byzantine tradition toward a more naturalistic and emotionally resonant style. The delicate modeling of faces, the subtle sense of depth, and the quiet dignity of the figures all hinted at the artistic revolution that would soon follow. In this post, I’ll reflect on how Cimabue’s Maestà not only embodies the spiritual vision of its time but also left a lasting impression on me as a viewer, and on the course of Western art.

Cimabue’s Maestà di Assisi is in the south transept of the Lower Church of the Basilica of San Francesco in Assisi, a site of profound spiritual and artistic significance. The Basilica, constructed in the 13th century to honor Saint Francis, consists of two levels: the soaring Gothic Upper Church and the more intimate, Romanesque Lower Church. Within this dim, contemplative space, the Maestà forms part of a rich fresco program that includes scenes from the lives of the Virgin and Saint Francis, as well as works by other major artists of the period, including Giotto, Pietro Cavallini, and Simone Martini. Together, these masterpieces transform the Lower Church into a visual pilgrimage through the early stages of Italian art, where Cimabue’s contributions mark a critical bridge between the Byzantine tradition and the emerging naturalism of the Renaissance.

Cimabue, ca. 1240-ca. 1302
The Madonna in Majesty,
1285-86, tempera on panel, 385 x 223 cm, Uffizi Gallery, Florence, Italy
Maestà di Assisi, 1285-1288, fresco, 320×340 cm, Basilica of San Francesco in Assisi, Italy – Photo Credit: Amalia Spiliakou, April 2025

Cimabue, born Cenni di Pepo around 1240 in Florence, is widely regarded as one of the pivotal figures in the evolution of Western art. He was trained in the Byzantine tradition, which dominated Italian painting in the 13th century with its stylized forms and gold backgrounds, but Cimabue began to break from these conventions in subtle yet significant ways. Active mainly in Florence and later in Assisi, he worked on both panel paintings and large-scale fresco cycles. His most famous surviving works include the Santa Trinita Maestà (Uffizi Gallery), the Crucifix at Santa Croce, and his contributions to the decoration of the Basilica of San Francesco in Assisi. Cimabue was also the teacher of Giotto, whose revolutionary approach to realism would carry forward and amplify the artistic shift that Cimabue had initiated. Although his style remained rooted in medieval spirituality, Cimabue laid the groundwork for the expressive potential and spatial complexity that would define early Renaissance art.

Cimabue’s work is characterized by a remarkable tension between Byzantine rigidity and the early stirrings of naturalism. In his Assisi frescoes, particularly the Maestà in the Lower Church, he introduces a greater sense of depth and volume through delicate shading and a more thoughtful use of space. The figures, while still hieratic and front-facing, possess a dignity and gravitas that suggest a growing concern with human presence and emotional resonance. The Maestà di Assisi exemplifies this transition: the Virgin sits enthroned in a symmetrical, richly colored composition that respects traditional iconography, but the softened contours of her face and the more varied, overlapping arrangement of the angels begin to imply a spatial realism that was new for its time. Cimabue’s aesthetic choices reflect both reverence for sacred themes and a quiet but revolutionary move toward a more lifelike visual language—one that would deeply influence the course of Italian art.

Cimabue, ca. 1240-ca. 1302
Maestà di Assisi,
1285-1288, fresco, 320×340 cm, Basilica of San Francesco in Assisi, Italy – Photo Credit: Amalia Spiliakou, April 2025

In Cimabue’s Maestà di Assisi, Saint Francis is represented standing to the right of the throne, distinguishable by his simple friar’s habit, bare feet, and the visible stigmata on his hands, feet, and chest—a gesture of his deep union with Christ’s suffering. According to tradition the image of the saint is based on eyewitness descriptions by those who knew him personally and is considered one of the earliest and most authentic portrayals of Francis. The fresco originally included other figures, possibly Saint Anthony of Padua, on the left side, but that section is now lost, suggesting that the original composition once conveyed a broader devotional context. The contrast between the elevated, richly dressed figures of the Virgin and Child and the humble, sober figure of Francis reinforces the spiritual ideals of Franciscan humility and poverty. The recent restoration, completed in early 2024, which removed centuries of overpainting and yellowed protective layers, has revived the sharpness of Francis’s face and refined features, attributes described in medieval sources, allowing viewers today to reconnect more directly with Cimabue’s original vision and the powerful symbolism of the Poverello himself.

For a Student Activity titled Compare and Contrast Activity: Cimabue’s Two Maestà, please… Check HERE!

Bibliography: https://www.lavoce.it/assisi-presentato-il-restauro-che-svela-il-vero-volto-di-san-francesco/?utm_source=chatgpt.com and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cimabue?utm_source=chatgpt.com and https://www.assisinews.it/speciali/svelata-la-maesta-di-assisi-restituita-allaffresco-la-vera-materia-del-cimabue-foto/?utm_source=chatgpt.com and https://www.lanazione.it/cosa-fare/il-capolavoro-di-cimabue-gloria-alla-maesta-di-assisi-sublime-luce-al-restauro-8aaee18e?utm_source=chatgpt.com

The Elderly Couple from Voltera

Etruscan Urn of an Elderly Couple, 1st century BC, Terracotta, Museo Etrusco Guarnacci, Volterra, Italy – Photo Credit: Amalia Spiliakou, April 2025

Among the most evocative remnants of Etruscan funerary culture are the terracotta urns that once housed the ashes of the deceased, vessels not only of the body but of memory and identity. Urns featuring reclining couples engaged in a perpetual banquet scene offer a powerful glimpse into Etruscan beliefs about death and the afterlife. These intimate portrayals, often found in burial contexts, reflect a society that viewed death not as an end but as a continuation of life’s pleasures and social bonds. The Elderly Couple from Volterra, a remarkable terracotta lid housed in the Voltera Museo Etrusco Guarnacci, stands as a moving example of this tradition. Depicting a serene, aging pair side by side in eternal repose, the work speaks volumes about affection, legacy, and the Etruscan celebration of human connection beyond the grave.

I visited the Museo Etrusco Guarnacci in April 2025, drawn by its reputation as one of the oldest public museums in Europe, and I was not disappointed. The museum holds a quiet, contemplative atmosphere that feels perfectly suited to its long history and the ancient civilization it celebrates. Housed in the elegant Palazzo Desideri-Tangassi since 1877, the museum is the result of the extraordinary efforts of Mario Guarnacci, an 18th-century Volterran abbot and historian whose passion for antiquity helped preserve the city’s rich Etruscan heritage. Guarnacci’s vision was unusually forward-thinking: he not only amassed a remarkable collection but donated it to the public, ensuring that Volterra’s archaeological treasures remained in local hands and accessible to future generations.

Walking through the galleries, I was struck by the contrast between the museum’s two “souls.” Some rooms retain their 19th-century atmosphere, where rows of urns and shelves of artifacts sit densely arranged according to material or motif, reflecting a historical approach to display. Other sections have been redesigned to offer a modern, more interpretive experience, with carefully selected pieces presented along a chronological path that brings the Etruscan story into clearer focus. The upper floor, dedicated to Hellenistic Volterra, captures the artistic and cultural vitality of the city just before its integration into the Roman world, while the ground floor offers an elegant introduction to its earlier phases, from Villanovan to Classical.

What makes the Museo Guarnacci so special is how naturally it fits within the fabric of Volterra itself. This is a city where history isn’t hidden behind glass, it’s embedded in its walls, streets, and rhythm of life. The museum doesn’t just preserve Etruscan culture, it reinforces the living dialogue between past and present that defines Volterra’s character. Its locally sourced collection, displayed in a building that reflects layers of the city’s own evolution, makes the museum feel less like a separate institution and more like a thoughtful extension of the city’s identity. Visiting it was not just an exploration of ancient artifacts, but of the cultural values that continue to shape Volterra today.

The lid of the so-called Urn of the Elderly Spouses, now one of the most iconic pieces in the Museo Etrusco Guarnacci in Volterra, offers a rare and moving glimpse into Etruscan funerary art. Discovered in 1743 in a chamber tomb at the Ulimeto necropolis, the 41 cm in height terracotta piece, depicts an elderly married couple reclining together on a banquet couch, a klinai, a motif deeply rooted in Etruscan traditions of commemorating the dead as participants in eternal feasting. Intriguingly, both hollow figures feature large openings at the top of their heads, possibly designed for the insertion of ashes, raising the possibility that this piece served not merely as a lid but as the urn itself. The male figure rests in a semi-recumbent pose, while the woman, unusually, lies prone and raises her face toward him, her missing forearm suggesting she may once have been shown in a tender, caressing gesture. Both are dressed in tunics and cloaks, with the woman’s garment sleeveless, and the sculptor emphasized signs of age, wrinkles, sagging cheeks, thinning hair, imbuing the scene with poignant realism. Likely commissioned in the 1st century BC, the work draws on older iconography to evoke dignity, memory, and shared legacy.

Etruscan Urn of an Elderly Couple, 1st century BC, Terracotta, Museo Etrusco Guarnacci, Volterra, Italy – Photo Credit: Amalia Spiliakou, April 2025

Aesthetically, the urn stands apart for its expressive force and quiet originality. Unlike the more standardized examples of Etruscan cinerary sculpture, this piece refuses idealization in favor of a strikingly human portrayal of aging bodies and enduring companionship. The deeply etched facial features, furrowed brows, veined hands, softened flesh, reflect not only technical skill but also a sensitive awareness of the passage of time. Yet, scholars suggest that despite this vivid realism, the work was not intended as a literal portrait of a known Volterran couple. Instead, it follows a stylistic convention of the period: a generalized “type” marked by apparent naturalism, crafted to evoke emotional resonance rather than exact likeness. The result is a powerful blend of personal and symbolic, an image of love, memory, and the continuity of human bonds beyond death. Set within the museum’s broader collection, the Urn of the Elderly Spouses captures the spirit of Etruscan funerary belief while offering a universal meditation on age, intimacy, and the desire to be remembered together.

For a Student Activity, inspired by the Voltera Urn, please… Check HERE!

Bibliography: https://volterratur.it/en/poi/guarnacci-etruscan-museum/ and https://www.facebook.com/groups/archeologyandcivilizations/posts/9143041642455945/

Rhyl Sands

David Cox, UK artist, 1783–1859
Rhyl Sands, c.1854, Oil on Canvas, 454 x 630 mm, the TATE, London, UK https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/cox-rhyl-sands-t04130

Standing on the broad, breezy shore of Rhyl Sands, it’s easy to understand why David Cox was drawn to this stretch of the North Wales coast. In his painting Rhyl Sands, Cox captures not just the physical beauty of the beach—its golden expanse, the hazy sky, and the play of light on wet sand—but also the fleeting rhythms of seaside life. This was a place where families gathered, fishermen worked, and artists found endless inspiration. I’ve always found something quietly moving in Cox’s work; there’s a sense of peace in the wide-open space and an affection for the simple, everyday moments that unfold along the shore.

David Cox (1783–1859) was a prominent British landscape painter and one of the most important figures of the early English watercolour tradition. Born in Birmingham, he began his artistic career painting theatrical scenery before turning to landscape painting. Cox studied at the Royal Academy Schools and exhibited regularly at both the Royal Academy and the Society of Painters in Water Colours. He spent much of his career working between London and Birmingham, and later in life frequently visited North Wales, which became a major source of inspiration. His work played a key role in elevating watercolour painting to a respected art form in Britain.

Cox’s aesthetic is marked by a deep sensitivity to light, weather, and atmosphere. He is known for his expressive brushwork and ability to capture the fleeting moods of nature rather than its exact details. In his later years, his style became increasingly free and vigorous, often described as a forerunner to Impressionism in its focus on immediacy and movement. Rather than tightly controlled compositions, Cox preferred open scenes—windswept landscapes, coastal views, and everyday rural life—rendered with a bold yet subtle handling of colour and form. His work is celebrated for its emotional depth and naturalism, blending observation with a poetic interpretation of the landscape.

Rhyl Sands was painted by David Cox, a master of the British watercolour tradition, in 1854. By the time he created this painting, Cox was in his early seventies and had recently embraced oil painting following his training under W. J. Müller. He developed a particular attachment to North Wales, especially the coastal town of Rhyl, making multiple sketching trips there from the early 1840s. This version, one of three oil paintings on the subject, was acquired by Tate Britain in 1985 (Accession T04130) with help from the Friends of the Tate Gallery .

In Rhyl Sands, Cox opts for a painterly, weather-focused style, showcasing his mature technique in oils. The canvas, measuring 63 × 45.4 cm, is dominated by a sweeping sky of soft greys and whites that cast a delicate light over the sandy shore and its gently scattered figures. His brushwork is loose and expressive, blending sea, sand, and sky into an atmospheric whole rather than a detailed scene. Small human forms, beach carts, and distant buildings appear almost incidental, giving the composition a mood of open, unhurried space. The visual effect, achieved with muted tones and broad strokes, reflects Cox’s deep engagement with natural light and transient weather phenomena, qualities often seen as anticipating the Impressionist movement .

With its soft light, open composition, and subtle human presence, Rhyl Sands reflects Cox’s mature vision, rooted in observation but elevated by emotion and atmosphere. In blending the familiar rhythms of coastal life with an almost poetic treatment of light and space, the painting not only celebrates a specific landscape but also exemplifies the enduring power of landscape painting to evoke feeling, memory, and place.

For a PowerPoint Presentation of Rhyl Sands by David Cox, please… Check HERE!

Bibliography: https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/cox-rhyl-sands-t04130

Lorenzo di Credi

Lorenzo di Credi, 1456/59-1537
Venus, c. 1490, Oil on Canvas, 151×69 cm, Uffizi Gallery, Florence, Italy
Photo Credit: Amalia Spiliakou, April 2025

In the rich tapestry of Renaissance Florence, few artists garnered the kind of admiration that Lorenzo di Credi did, both in his time and in the eyes of later historians. Giorgio Vasari, in his Lives of the Artists, offers a glowing account of Lorenzo’s early promise and virtuous character, highlighting his transformation from the son of Andrea Sciarpelloni into a renowned artist known simply as “Credi”, a name inherited from his master out of sheer excellence. Vasari’s praise is more than anecdotal; it frames Lorenzo as a model of artistic dedication and moral integrity. In this blog post, we will use Vasari’s vivid narrative as a lens to explore Lorenzo di Credi’s works housed in the Uffizi Gallery, tracing how the values and skills admired by his contemporaries continue to resonate through his paintings today.

To better understand the foundations of Lorenzo di Credi’s reputation, we turn directly to Vasari’s account, where his admiration for the young artist’s talent and character is unmistakably clear: While Master Credi, an excellent goldsmith in his time, was working in Florence with much credit and name, Andrea Sciarpelloni placed with him, so that he might learn that trade, his son Lorenzo, a young man of beautiful intellect and excellent habits. And because as the master was skilled and willing to teach, so the disciple learned with study and speed whatever was shown to him, it was not long before Lorenzo became not only a diligent and good designer, but a goldsmith so polished and skilled that no young man was equal to him in that time, and this with such praise from Credi that from then on Lorenzo was always called, not Lorenzo Sciarpelloni, but Credi by everyone… https://it.wikisource.org/wiki/Le_vite_de%27_pi%C3%B9_eccellenti_pittori,_scultori_e_architettori_(1568)/Lorenzo_di_Credi

Lorenzo di Credi was a Florentine painter and goldsmith whose artistic career flourished during the Italian Renaissance. He began his training in the workshop of Master Credi, the goldsmith, and then Andrea del Verrocchio, where he worked alongside notable contemporaries such as Leonardo da Vinci and Pietro Perugino. Lorenzo’s original apprenticed as a goldsmith translated seamlessly into his painting, earning him high praise from Giorgio Vasari, who admired both his moral character and artistic discipline. Following Verrocchio’s death, Lorenzo took over the workshop, continuing its legacy of refined technique and balanced composition. Though he never achieved the fame of some of his peers, Lorenzo remained a respected figure in Florence for his devout lifestyle and commitment to purity in art.

The artist’s style is characterized by a delicate precision, serene composition, and an emphasis on clarity and harmony. Deeply influenced by Verrocchio’s sculptural forms and Leonardo’s soft modeling, his works often feature idealized figures with calm expressions, set against meticulously rendered landscapes. His use of fine detail and polished surfaces reflects his background as a goldsmith, while his religious subjects convey a deep spiritual devotion. Unlike the dynamic motion seen in later High Renaissance works, Lorenzo’s paintings tend toward stillness and contemplation, embodying a quiet grace that exemplifies the early Renaissance ideals of beauty, order, and restraint.

Lorenzo di Credi’s Venus, painted around 1490–1494 and now housed in the Uffizi Gallery, offers a strikingly different interpretation of the goddess of love compared to the more ethereal versions by his contemporaries. Discovered in 1869 in a storeroom of the Medici Villa at Cafaggiolo, this oil on canvas work is grounded in Classical tradition, evoking the modesty and stance of Praxiteles’ famous sculptures. Yet, its aesthetic departs from Renaissance ideals of graceful femininity: Venus stands firmly, her body rendered with solid, almost masculine anatomical features such as defined biceps, and her feet planted heavily on the ground. Unlike Botticelli’s iconic Venus—floating delicately on a shell in a luminous seascape, Credi’s figure is monumental and statue-like, silhouetted against a dark, undefined background. Even the flowing veil, instead of dancing in the breeze, falls straight down to act as a stabilizing pillar. This Venus, painted before Credi’s turn toward religious austerity under the influence of Savonarola, reflects both his mastery of form and his engagement with antiquity, while its grounded presence challenges the viewer to reconsider conventional ideals of beauty and sensuality in Renaissance art.

For a PowerPoint Presentation on Lorenzo di Credi’s oeuvre, please… Check HERE!

Bibliography: https://www.virtualuffizi.com/lorenzo-di-credi.html and https://www.flickr.com/photos/nikonpaul/33202209738

Bust of a Lady

Bust of a Lady, circa 410 AD, from an Asia Minor workshop, possibly in
Aphrodisias, circa 410, white Phrygian (Dokimion) Marble, Height: 56 cm, Archaeological Museum of Chania, Greece

In the Archaeological Museum of Chania on the island of Crete, the Bust of a Lady offers a rare window into the shifting artistic and cultural values of the Late Roman and Early Christian period through the medium of female portraiture. During this era, women’s portraits began to diverge from classical Roman realism and overt displays of status, embracing a more stylized, introspective aesthetic aligned with emerging Christian ideals. Features such as large, contemplative eyes and serene expressions came to symbolize inner virtue and spiritual depth. While hairstyles and clothing still hinted at social rank, they also reflected increasing modesty, mirroring broader societal transformations.

This particular bust depicts a woman of aristocratic beauty in the prime of her life, aged approximately 25 to 30. She is shown frontally, with her neck gently turned to the right, lending the portrait a poised and lifelike presence. Her oval face is framed by a tall forehead, almond-shaped eyes once inlaid with rose-colored glass, small full lips, and a strong chin—features that convey both grace and inner fortitude. A decorative band of twenty-two stylized curls runs across her forehead and temples, while four braids crown her head, testifying to her refined appearance.

She is draped in a heavy himation falling in deep, classical folds over a lighter chiton, a detail that evokes the sculptural traditions of earlier periods and enhances the portrait’s intellectual elegance. Although her left shoulder is only partially modeled, the form suggests the bust was designed for a niche setting, likely within a private villa, where such an omission would remain unseen. The combination of fine craftsmanship, classical references, and material opulence speaks to both her high status and the enduring artistry of late Roman Crete.

Although initially dated between the 2nd and 4th centuries, recent scholarship proposes a more precise date in the early 5th century, during the reign of Theodosios II (c. 410 AD). This dating is based on strong stylistic parallels with imperial portraits of Valentinian II and Theodosios II, and the bust is thought to have originated in an Asia Minor workshop, likely Aphrodisias. If correct, this attribution provides rare evidence of continued cultural and artistic exchange between Crete and Constantinople following the catastrophic earthquake of 365 AD.

This striking portrait, crafted from fine-grained marble was unearthed in 1982 in Nea Chora, a neighborhood of modern Chania that once formed the western sector of ancient Kydonia. Found in unstratified fill, it lacks a secure archaeological context. Nonetheless, the area was continuously inhabited from the Roman to early Byzantine periods, and the sculpture’s discovery in a historically wealthy district known for luxurious homes supports the notion that it belonged to an elite and culturally vibrant community.

While Crete is most famously celebrated for its Bronze Age Minoan civilization, the island also enjoyed a remarkable cultural resurgence under Roman rule, a period that produced refined works of art like the Bust of a Lady in the Archaeological Museum of Chania. In a region often viewed through the lens of its ancient past, the portrait from Kydonia invites us to appreciate the island’s lesser-known legacy: a vibrant late antique society that continued to engage with the broader currents of imperial art, identity, and belief.

For a Student Activity inspired by the Bust of a Lady in the Archaeological Museum of Chania, please… Check HERE!

Bibliography: Heaven & Earth, Edited by Anastasia Drandaki, Demetra Papanikola-Bakirtzi, Anastasia Tourta, Exhibition Catalogue, Athens 2013 https://www.academia.edu/3655015/Heaven_and_Earth_Art_of_Byzantium_from_Greek_Collections_edited_by_Anastasia_Drandaki_Demetra_Papanikola_Bakirtzi_and_Anastasia_Tourta_Exh_cat_Athens_2013_238_9_275 Pages: 56-57 and https://amch.gr/collection/eikonistiki-protomi-astis-l-3176/

The Ironworkers’ Noontime

Thomas Pollock Anshutz, American Artist, 1851-1912
The Ironworkers’ Noontime, 1880, Oil on Canvas, 43.2 x 60.6 cm, de Young/Legion of Honor Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco, CA, USA https://www.famsf.org/artworks/the-ironworkers-noontime

In an unexpected twist of history, Thomas Pollock Anshutz’s The Ironworkers’ Noontime, a powerful portrayal of laborers taking a rare moment of rest amidst the harsh realities of an iron mill, found itself repurposed as the centerpiece of an advertisement for Ivory Soap. This unlikely pairing of industrial grit and domestic cleanliness highlights a fascinating intersection of art and commerce, reframing the painting’s somber realism as a symbol of purity and progress. This transformation invites us to explore not just the artistic merits of Anshutz’s work but also its evolving cultural significance, as it transitioned from a poignant statement on the working class to a tool for marketing middle-class ideals.

Advertisement for Ivory Soap, c.1890 (colour litho) by Thomas Pollock Anschutz (1851-1912) Private Collection https://www.mediastorehouse.com.au/fine-art-finder/artists/american-school/ad-ivory-soap-c-1890-colour-litho-22922188.html

Thomas Pollock Anshutz’s The Ironworkers’ Noontime presents a vivid snapshot of life in an industrial iron mill during the late 19th century. The painting captures a group of workers taking a break, their figures scattered across the foreground in various states of rest and conversation. The central figures are shirtless, their muscular forms accentuated by the play of light and shadow, evoking both their physical strength and the exhaustion of labor. The background is dominated by the hazy glow of molten iron and the imposing structures of the factory, subtly reminding the viewer of the workers’ demanding environment. Anshutz’s composition seamlessly integrates these human and industrial elements, drawing attention to the relationship between man and machine in this transformative era.

While Anshutz predates the formal emergence of the Ashcan School, The Ironworkers’ Noontime embodies many of its aesthetic values, making it a precursor to the movement. The painting’s gritty realism, focus on the working class, and unidealized portrayal of labor align with the Ashcan artists’ commitment to capturing the raw truths of urban and industrial life. Anshutz’s use of muted colors and dramatic lighting enhances the atmospheric tension, creating a balance between the harshness of the mill and the humanity of its workers. This empathetic yet unsentimental depiction of the labor force stands as a testament to his artistic foresight, bridging the academic traditions of his time with the emerging modernist tendencies that would later define the Ashcan ethos.

Thomas Pollock Anshutz (1851–1912) was an influential American painter and teacher, best known for his realist depictions of industrial and working-class life. Born in Newport, Kentucky, Anshutz studied art at the National Academy of Design in New York and the Pennsylvania Academy of Fine Arts (PAFA) in Philadelphia. At PAFA, he became a pivotal figure under the mentorship of Thomas Eakins, with whom he shared a commitment to realism and the human figure. Anshutz’s early works reflect his meticulous academic training and a deep interest in the social and physical conditions of his subjects, which would become hallmarks of his career.

In addition to his painting, Anshutz was a celebrated teacher who influenced a generation of American artists, including members of the Ashcan School like Robert Henri and John Sloan. As a faculty member at PAFA, he succeeded Eakins as head of the school’s painting department, shaping its curriculum with a focus on direct observation and technical excellence. Though his body of work is relatively small, pieces like The Ironworkers’ Noontime stand as iconic representations of the social realist tradition in American art. Anshutz’s legacy endures not only through his paintings but also through his contributions to the development of modern American art, bridging the academic traditions of the 19th century with the expressive realism of the 20th.

The Ashcan style represents a pivotal movement in early 20th-century American art, characterized by its unvarnished depiction of urban and working-class life. Rejecting the idealized aesthetics of academic art and the genteel subjects favored by the Gilded Age, Ashcan artists focused on the gritty realities of modern cities—crowded streets, tenements, laborers, and everyday scenes imbued with raw emotion. Their use of dark, earthy tones and loose, dynamic brushwork emphasized immediacy and authenticity over polished perfection. Though Thomas Pollock Anshutz predates the formal Ashcan School, his work laid the groundwork for its ethos. Anshutz’s empathetic yet unsentimental portrayal of laborers reflects the same commitment to realism and the human condition that would define the Ashcan movement, making him an essential precursor to its development.

For a PowerPoint Presentation of Thomas Pollock Anshutz’s Oeuvre, please… Check HERE!

Triumph of Neptune and the Four Seasons

Triumph of Neptune and the Four Seasons, from La Chebba, Tunisia, late 2nd century AD,  Mosaic, Bardo National Museum, Tunis, Tunisia https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Neptune_Roman_mosaic_Bardo_Museum_Tunis.jpg

I remember standing before the Triumph of Neptune and the Four Seasons mosaic at the Bardo Museum, in Tunisia, sunlight filtering through the high windows as if to echo the brilliance of the scene before me. Neptune, regal and commanding, surged forward in his chariot drawn by sea creatures, while the Four Seasons circled him in a dance of eternal return, each one marked by fruits, flowers, or flowing cloaks. It was as if time itself had been trapped in tesserae, inviting me to reflect on nature’s rhythms and the grandeur of ancient imagination. Today, on the first day of Summer 2025, I’m drawn back to that moment, a reminder that every season begins with awe and the quiet power of renewal.

The Triumph of Neptune and the Four Seasons mosaic was unearthed in 1902 during archaeological excavations at a Roman seaside villa in La Chebba, a coastal town in northeastern Tunisia. The excavation, carried out by archaeologists D. Novak and A. Epinat, revealed a Roman villa comprising twelve rooms, most of which were paved with mosaics of notably good style. The principal room featured a grand composition: at the center, Neptune rides over the waves, attended by two companions, while the four corners are occupied by elegant personifications of the Four Seasons. Likely serving as an atrium or formal reception space, this square, columned room showcased the opulence and artistic refinement of Roman domestic life. Dating from the mid-2nd century AD, during the reign of Antoninus Pius, the mosaic reflects the cultural and aesthetic heights achieved in Roman Africa. After its discovery, it was transferred to the Bardo National Museum in Tunis, where it remains one of the most admired treasures of the collection.

The central medallion of the mosaic from La Chebba presents a commanding depiction of Neptune, the Roman god of the sea. He stands prominently in a quadriga—a four-horse chariot—drawn by hippocamps, mythical sea creatures that are part horse and part fish. Neptune is portrayed nearly nude, showcasing a muscular physique, and is adorned with a nimbus, symbolizing his divinity. In his hands, he holds a trident and a dolphin, traditional attributes associated with his dominion over the sea. The chariot is guided by a Triton and a Nereid, both depicted partially submerged, emphasizing the marine setting of the scene. This composition, as analyzed by Gifty Ako-Adounvo in her 1991 thesis, is unique in Roman mosaic art for combining Neptune with the Four Seasons, reflecting a sophisticated iconography that intertwines themes of nature’s cycles and divine authority.

In the Tunisian mosaic, the Four Seasons are strategically placed at the four corners of the square composition, creating a visual framework around the central circular medallion that features Neptune in his marine chariot. This architectural arrangement draws the viewer’s eye inward while symbolically enclosing Neptune’s dominion within the eternal cycle of time.

In the Triumph of Neptune and the Four Seasons mosaic from La Chebba, each Season is personified as a female figure and placed in one of the four corners of the square composition, surrounding the central medallion of Neptune. These figures are accompanied by specific animals that enrich the symbolic and seasonal imagery. Spring, adorned with floral motifs, wears a floral crown, evoking rebirth and the blossoming of nature. She is paired with a dog, possibly a greyhound, evoking themes of pastoral vitality and energy. Summer, holding sheaves of wheat, is flanked by a lion, representing the strength and intensity of the sun at its peak. Autumn, bearing grapes or a cornucopia, appears with a leopard, reinforcing the season’s association with Dionysian festivity and harvest. Winter, heavily cloaked and bearing pinecones or bare branches, is accompanied by a boar, an animal linked to the hunt and the harshness of the cold months.

Together, the figures of the Four Seasons not only anchor the composition visually but also embody a deeper message of natural rhythm and divine governance. Their accompanying animals, drawn from both myth and the natural world, intensify the seasonal symbolism while reflecting the broader North African mosaic tradition, which skillfully weaves cosmic order with scenes of rural life and agricultural labor.

For Student Activities inspired by the La Chebba mosaic, please… Check HERE!

Bibliography: American Journal of Archaeology, Jul. – Sep., 1903, Vol. 7, No. 3 (Jul. – Sep., 1903), pp. 357-404 Published by: Archaeological Institute of America, and https://honorthegodsblog.wordpress.com/2015/02/25/triumph-of-neptune-and-the-four-seasons-from-la/, and https://www.romeartlover.it/Bardo.html

Angelos Giallinas

Angelos Giallina, Greek Artist, 1857 – 1939
The Parthenon, Watercolour over Pencil, 273 by 455 mm, Private Collection
https://www.sothebys.com/en/buy/auction/2024/royal-noble/the-parthenon?locale=en

In his approach to the Parthenon, Angelos Giallinas (1857–1939), a prominent Greek watercolorist of the late 19th and early 20th centuries, not only portrayed the monument as an architectural subject but elevated it to a lyrical symbol of Greek heritage. His work, deeply connected to the theme of Light, Memory, and Reverence, reflects a profound sensitivity to the interplay between the ancient ruins and the surrounding natural environment. Born in Corfu, Giallinas studied at the local School of Fine Arts before continuing his education in Venice, Naples, and Rome. There, he absorbed the refined tonalities of the Italian landscape tradition, which he later fused with a uniquely Greek sensibility rooted in poetic realism and national pride.

Giallinas’s depictions of the Parthenon are marked by a restrained yet evocative use of watercolor. He did not aim for archaeological precision but instead emphasized the atmospheric qualities of the scene, the golden hues of Attic sunlight, the gradations of the Athenian sky, and the quiet dialogue between the ruins and the surrounding landscape. This impressionistic approach aligned with European aesthetic movements of his time while remaining deeply connected to the emotional resonance of place and memory in Greek culture.

Throughout his career, Giallinas gained significant recognition both at home and abroad. He held successful exhibitions across Europe, including in London, where his work attracted the attention of collectors and critics. In 1902, he was commissioned by the British royal family to create a series of Greek landscapes, further elevating his international profile. He played a pivotal role in legitimizing watercolor as a medium for serious artistic expression within Greek art, moving beyond its traditional role as a preparatory tool.

Technically, Giallinas mastered watercolor’s fluidity and transparency with exceptional subtlety. His brushwork was controlled yet expressive, employing translucent washes to create depth without sacrificing luminosity. He avoided harsh contrasts, favoring gradations of color that conveyed a meditative stillness. In his hands, watercolor became a means not just of depiction, but of evocation—his skies, seas, and stones imbued with feeling as much as form.

Crucially, Giallinas’s art reflects the broader cultural currents of post-independence Greece, where landscape painting became a vehicle for expressing national identity. His serene views of the Parthenon and other iconic sites participated in the 19th-century project of reconnecting modern Greece to its classical past. Yet his interpretation was not triumphant or didactic; instead, it was introspective and elegiac. By rendering these monuments with atmospheric sensitivity rather than monumental grandeur, Giallinas offered a vision of Greece that was rooted in continuity, memory, and quiet resilience—qualities that resonated deeply in a society still defining itself between antiquity and modernity.

When I look at Giallinas’s paintings of the Parthenon, I’m struck by their quiet power. There’s no theatrical drama, no exaggerated gesture—just a deep, contemplative calm. He treats the monument not as a tourist spectacle but as something intimate: a memory held in light and stone. The watercolor bleeds gently around the contours of the ruins, dissolving into the pale Athenian sky, as if he’s painting not only what he sees but what he feels. The Parthenon appears suspended in time, drifting between history and the present. Giallinas’s brush whispers rather than declares—and in that quietness, he captures something enduring, something essentially Greek.

For a Student Activity, inspired by Angelos Giallinas’s interpretation of the Parthenon, please… Check HERE!

You can view a former Teacher-Curator BLOG POST titled ‘Garden in Corfu by Angelos Giallinas’… https://www.teachercurator.com/art/garden-in-corfu-by-angelos-giallinas/?fbclid=IwY2xjawKIGElleHRuA2FlbQIxMABicmlkETF5ZWtES1JYMDBPQVY5c055AR7-a8br2Ukq3ahJuUCSU0eESsf5WwODDQtNdgSK0kYgNnSS856uiARVWSentw_aem_T8IM2xzIAGQQEC4qcWajdQ

Bibliography: https://corfuguidedtours.com/a-renowned-painters-historic-mansion/?utm_source=chatgpt.com and https://haaa.gr/news/en_30.php?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Statuette of Asklepios Enthroned

Statuette of Asklepios Enthroned, Athenian workshop, 150 – 200 AD, Marble, Height: 42.3 cm, Archaeological Museum of Ancient Corinth, Greece https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1019102956923674&id=100064719367083&set=a.462183875948921&locale=el_GR

…Asclepius, that gentle craftsman who drove pain from the limbs that he healed, that hero who cured all types of diseases… as Pindar writes in Pythian 3, was the ancient Greek god of medicine and healing, both revered and deified for his mastery over human suffering. This divine healer is brought vividly to life in the Statuette of Asklepios Enthroned, crafted in an Athenian workshop between 150–200 AD and now housed in the Archaeological Museum of Ancient Corinth. Carved from marble and standing 42.3 cm tall, the figure captures Asclepius in a moment of quiet authority, seated with the familiar serpent-entwined staff at his side—a timeless symbol of restoration and medical care. Though created centuries after the height of his cult, the statuette reflects the enduring presence of Asclepius in both public worship and private devotion, embodying the belief in divine healing that spanned from the classical world into the Roman era. https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0162%3Abook%3DP.%3Apoem%3D3

The Ancient Greek myths of Asclepius tell the story of a mortal born to the god Apollo and the human woman Coronis, who was raised and taught the healing arts by the wise centaur Chiron. Gifted beyond any healer before him, Asclepius became so skilled that he was said to cure incurable diseases and even bring the dead back to life. This miraculous power, however, drew the ire of Zeus, who feared that such abilities would upset the natural balance between life and death. In response, Zeus struck Asclepius down with a thunderbolt, ending his mortal life but paving the way for his deification. Worshipped across the Greek world, particularly in healing sanctuaries known as Asclepieia, Asclepius became a symbol of divine compassion and medical wisdom, bridging the realms of myth, religion, and early medical practice.

The healing sanctuaries of Asclepios become some of the most important religious and medical centers of the classical world. The most famous of these was at Epidaurus in the northeastern Peloponnese, a sprawling complex that included temples, dormitories for dream incubation, and even a theater. Other major centers of his cult were located on the island of Kos, where the physician Hippocrates is said to have trained, and at Pergamon in Asia Minor. In Athens, he was worshipped at the Asclepieion located at the foot of the Acropolis, near the Theater of Dionysus. These sanctuaries attracted the sick and afflicted from across the Greek world, who came seeking cures through ritual purification, offerings, and dreams in which Asclepius or his sacred serpent revealed treatments. His worship was not only a spiritual experience but also a foundational element in the evolution of ancient medicine.

Statuettes of deities from a late Roman house, Marble, Archaeological Museum of Ancient Corinth in Greece Photo: https://www.nga.gov/features/slideshows/from-the-ancient-to-the-byzantine-world.html#slide_2

The Statuette of Asklepios Enthroned, now housed in the Archaeological Museum of Ancient Corinth, was discovered during 1999 excavation period (by the American School of Classical Studies) of a domestic shrine within a luxurious Roman villa in the Panayia Field area of Corinth. The villa was destroyed by a violent earthquake in the late fourth century AD, preserving a collection of marble statuettes representing various deities, including Artemis, Dionysos, Herakles, Pan, Europa and Roma, alongside Asklepios (Sanders 1999, 441–444). These statuettes were part of a private cultic assemblage, suggesting ongoing pagan devotional practices within the home, even as Christianity was becoming dominant in the region. The presence of these figures in such an opulent residence reflects the persistence—albeit increasingly private—of traditional Greco-Roman religious customs among segments of the local elite during the final phases of pagan worship in Late Antique Corinth

Dated to 150–200 AD and discovered in Corinth, the Statuette presents a richly detailed image of the healing god seated in quiet authority. Asclepius is shown leaning slightly forward on a high-backed throne, his head turned gently to the right. He wears a plain round wreath atop his parted, curling hair, which falls to his shoulders, and his face is framed by a mustache and full, curly beard. Draped in a himation that cascades from his left shoulder in V-shaped folds with a zigzag border, the god’s right arm once rested over a large coiled snake, his sacred symbol, positioned along the right side of the throne. His network-style sandals, tied above the ankle, rest on a substantial footstool with squat animal feet and a central groove, while the throne itself is ornately carved with square-incised panels on the back, lyre-shaped legs, and projecting wings. A cushion beneath him adds to the sense of formality and comfort, enhancing the image of divine majesty.

Scholars suggest that this statuette may be a scaled marble reinterpretation of the famed chryselephantine cult statue of Asclepius by Thrasymedes of Paros, described by Pausanias in the temple at Epidaurus (2.27.2). Like the legendary cult image, the Corinthian figure holds a staff in his left arm and extends his right hand toward the coiled serpent, reflecting iconography seen on fourth-century BC Epidaurian coins. The white marble and traces of gilding on the Panagia statuette evoke the luxurious materials of ivory and gold used in the original, indicating it was likely crafted in homage to the Epidaurian prototype. This connection underscores the continuity of Asclepius’ cult and the enduring reverence for his divine healing power well into the Roman period.

For a Student Activity inspired by the Statuette of Asklepios Enthroned in Corinth, please… Check HERE!

Bibliography: chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.ascsa.edu.gr/uploads/media/hesperia/25068051.pdf  Pagan Statuettes in Late Antique Corinth, Sculptures from the Panayia Domus, HESPERIA 77 (2008), Pages 89-161

Byzantine Engagement Ring in the Stathatos Collection

Engagement Ring with a Greek Inscription, about 1175–1300 AD, Gold and enamel, Diameter: 2.1 x 2.3 cm, National Archaeological Museum, Athens, Greece
Image courtesy of the National Archaeological Museum, Athens
https://blogs.getty.edu/iris/put-a-ring-on-it/

In the shimmering glow of Byzantium’s golden age, love and faith were often sealed in objects of exquisite craftsmanship and deep symbolic meaning. Among these treasures, Byzantine Engagement Rings stand as powerful tokens of devotion, not only between husband and wife but also to God. One such remarkable example is the Byzantine Engagement Ring in the Stathatos Collection, adorned with intricate enamel decoration, reflecting the era’s profound intertwining of romance and spirituality. This ring, much like the art and culture of its time, serves as a testament to a society where marriage was both a sacred bond and a reflection of divine harmony. Let us explore the beauty, symbolism, and historical significance of this extraordinary artifact.

Ashley Hilton’s Getty IRIS blog post, “Put a Ring On It,” sparked my curiosity about the deep personal and historical narratives embedded in Byzantine jewelry, particularly the Byzantine gold ring of Goudeles from the Stathatos Collection. This ring, inscribed with a dedication to a lady named Maria, serves as a tangible testament to love, devotion, and identity in the Byzantine world. Hilton’s discussion of the ring inspired me to delve deeper into its historical and social context, as well as the role of the Goudeles family in Byzantine society.

So, let’s explore the ‘who’, ‘how’ and ‘what’ of this amazing Byzantine Engagement Ring by posing some questions!

Who was Goudeles and who was Maria, and what do we know about their identity or social status in Byzantine society? The name “Goudeles” is associated with a prominent Byzantine family active from the 11th to the 15th centuries. Members of this family held various significant positions within the Byzantine Empire. The gold engagement ring from the Stathatos Collection bears an inscription (on bezel): MNHCTΡΟΝ |ΔΙΔΟΜΗΓΟΥ | ΔΕΛΗC M | AΡHA (I, Goudeles, give this engagement ring to Maria). While the exact identity of Goudeles and Maria remains uncertain, the ring’s craftsmanship and materials suggest that both the bride and the groom lived during the late 12th early 13th centuries, and belonged to wealthy and possibly influential families. ​For the groom, given the family’s historical prominence, it’s plausible that the Goudeles who commissioned this ring was a member of this distinguished lineage, reflecting the family’s sustained status within Byzantine society.

What was the historical significance of the Goudeles family in the Byzantine Empire? The Goudeles family was a prominent Byzantine lineage, contributing significantly to both the military and administrative sectors of the empire over several centuries. The earliest known reference to the family appears on a 10th-century lead seal, which mentions a member of the Goudeles family who held the titles of imperial protospatharios and strategos, signifying his high-ranking military status. However, the exact details of his service and the specific region he governed remain uncertain.

During the Komnenian period, one of the most notable figures was Basil Tzykandeles Goudeles, who married Eudokia Angelina, the daughter of Theodora Komnene and Constantine Angelos. This alliance linked the Goudeles family to the ruling Komnenian and Angelos dynasties, which produced emperors such as Isaac II Angelos and Alexios III Angelos.

In the late 14th and early 15th centuries, the Goudeles family strengthened its ties with the Palaiologan Dynasty through marriage. Among its distinguished members were Georgios Goudelis and Nicholas Goudelis. Georgios, in his testament, referred to himself as Ego Georgius Gudeles, servus prepotentis et sancti imperatoris et regis nostri (“I, George Gudeles, servant of our powerful and holy emperor and king”), reflecting his position within the Byzantine aristocracy. He served as mesazon (a chief ministerial role) under Emperors John V Palaiologos and Manuel II Palaiologos, assisting in governance and administration. Nicholas Goudeles, a diplomat in imperial service, was at one point considered for a high advisory position. During the final siege of Constantinople in 1453, he was among the defenders of the city’s Land Walls, and his fate after the city’s fall remains unknown. After the fall of Constantinople, members of the Goudeles family migrated to Italy, where they remained active in international commerce, particularly through cooperation with the maritime republic of Genoa.

Overall, the Goudeles family played a crucial role in Byzantine history, with members serving in high military, diplomatic, and administrative capacities. Their strategic alliances with ruling dynasties and their contributions to the empire’s governance reflect their lasting historical significance.

How does the design, decoration, and inscription of the Goudeles Engagement Ring in the Stathatos Collection showcase Byzantine artistry and symbolism? The Goudeles engagement ring in the Stathatos Collection is a fine example of inscribed Byzantine engagement jewelry, reflecting both artistic craftsmanship and social status. The ring’s band gradually widens to form an almost circular bezel. It is flat on the interior and slightly convex on the exterior, featuring an elaborate stylized vegetal decoration with intersecting blue spirals and green, red, and white flowers on its sides. The bezel is flat and contains a four-line inscription in blue enamel, framed within a green border. The intricate detailing, the use of precious materials, and the weight of the ring indicate that it likely belonged to a wealthy individual.

In Byzantine tradition, engagement rings (annuli pronubi), like wedding rings, were worn on the fourth digit (ring finger) of the left hand, as it was believed to have a direct connection to the heart, symbolizing eternal love and commitment. This ring exemplifies the fusion of Byzantine artistry, social hierarchy, and symbolic marital customs.

For a Student Activity, please… Check HERE!

Bibliography: https://blogs.getty.edu/iris/put-a-ring-on-it/ and https://www.doaks.org/resources/seals/byzantine-seals/BZS.1958.106.3763 and ΣΟΛΩΜΟΥ Σ. (2019). Η συμβολή της μελέτης των διαθηκών της παλαιολόγειας περιόδου στην έρευνα των κοσμικών αξιωμάτων και τιμητικών τίτλων. Byzantina Symmeikta, 29, 25–72. https://doi.org/10.12681/byzsym.15563 and https://www.academia.edu/31240474/Heaven_and_Earth_Art_of_Byzantium_from_Greek_Collections_exh_cat_National_Gallery_of_Art_Washington_DC_J_P_Getty_Museum_the_Art_Institute_of_Chicago_Athens_2013_Edited_by_A_Drandaki_A_Tourta_and_D_Papanikola_Bakirtzi